Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Timeout
I will say, I think the $114 billion "annually" must be an error. Even if that figure is for 10 years, it would mean 228,000 new bureaucrats at an average $50k/year. And---keep in mind---they will not all be in place for the full 10 years---so it's probably even more.

As I understand the issue, it seems that we are taking from Seniors (Medicare) to fund 30M Americans who do not have insurance. The 30M would each get a subsidy of $6K annually to buy insurance. I think this is where most of the money goes -- not to set up bureaucracies.

Your general point is well taken however. There will be a massive bureaucracy, but I am not sure the bill spells out how big and how it will be organized.

8 posted on 03/23/2010 5:18:07 AM PDT by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mlocher

No, I think you’re misunderstanding it.

The subsidies and Medicare cuts ARE in the bill. The writer is clearly referring to “discretionary” costs that are NOT in the CBO score.

He never says what those costs are. But calling them “operating costs” and “discretionary” leads me to assume he’s referring to costs of staffing/equipping those new agencies.

Obviously, this op-ed doesn’t provide those answers. But it royally pisses me off that, after a YEAR of intense debate, I couldn’t get a single Republican to ask this explosive question.

Yeah, late in the game they came out with the IRA talking points. But my guess is the public would be even more alarmed to find out there will be a quarter million NEW federal workers!


10 posted on 03/23/2010 5:33:50 AM PDT by Timeout (Brits have the royals. Russia, the Nomenklatura. WE have our Privileged "Public Servant" class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson