Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SC's Attorney General Will Challenge Health Care Bill (Health Care Bill Unconstitutional)
CarolinaLive.com ^ | March 22, 2010 | Continuous News Desk

Posted on 03/22/2010 5:02:26 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: real_patriotic_american

We need to encourage threads here on how to attack this thing. Not these rehashes on their victroy dance, posts about foreign countries or other nonsense.

These AGs lawsuits are one way to fight back. We need to come up with as many ways as possible to resist.


21 posted on 03/22/2010 5:28:56 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

We need to work to enccourage and push these cases. A main one that gets fast tracked and then ones in each state. Some strategy. Other people suggested suing Pelosi in every state. Maybe Stupak too.

We have to fight conventionally to get this fast tracked but also unconventionally (legally) but resist.


22 posted on 03/22/2010 5:33:52 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

I think the AGs are on the right track. As soon as anyone sees the brief please post it.

of isterest, Stupak soled his sorry a$$ for 3 airport improvement projects and a worthless piece of paper. Should something happen to Obama and Biden before we take back the House in Nov., “Queen” Nancy becomes Pres. and voids the EO just signed.

Nice going “Stuge-Pack”!


23 posted on 03/22/2010 5:38:01 AM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Airport kickback for Stupak!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2476680/posts


24 posted on 03/22/2010 5:41:41 AM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Aman to that!


25 posted on 03/22/2010 5:47:16 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

I’d like to see a criminal investigation into the deal with Stupak.


26 posted on 03/22/2010 5:48:08 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
The VA AG Ken Cuccinelli is also onboard and soemone said he is pretty sure they can get a fast track to SCOTUS.

Fast track to the court that gave us the Kelo decision which basically eliminates private property rights in favor of higher tax receipts?

Sorry, after Kelo I have no faith whatsoever in our Supreme Court. If we no longer have private property rights we have lost our Republic. Read Mark Levin's book Men in Black....

27 posted on 03/22/2010 5:50:15 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

The Supreme Court that shredded McCain Feingold a month or so ago.

The same McCain fake conservatives are campaigning for. I know Levin’s book. What do you suggest and don’t pin all your hops on Nov 2010.


28 posted on 03/22/2010 5:53:14 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Va has the best chance of getting it through to the USSC because of they are under the 3rd Circuit - otherwise known as the Rocket Docket.

The 3rd is THE quickest Court with a reputation for fast tracking - they are the direct opposite of the 9th Circus - while the 9th if overturned repeatedly every year, the 3rd rarely is overturned.


29 posted on 03/22/2010 5:54:11 AM PDT by Brytani (Good Morning Comrades!!! FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

Whoo Hoo! The Rocket Docket! Many Thanks! Awesome.

Ken Cuccinelli for President 2012.


30 posted on 03/22/2010 5:56:57 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

As of yesterday there were at least 38 states that were planning on filing individually or taking part in the Texas/Abbot filing. Some had a count of over 40 states.

With 38 States against this, we can bypass the USSC and go straight to a Constitutional Amendment.

2/3 of the States can introduce an Amendment, the House and Senate at that time must send it to the States for ratification where 3/4 much approve.

Do the math, with 38 we win.


31 posted on 03/22/2010 6:03:03 AM PDT by Brytani (Good Morning Comrades!!! FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
We need to come up with as many ways as possible to resist.

In SC, first John Spratt and then Lindsey Graham. Check out Spratt's opponent in SC-5, Mick Mulvaney. Mulvaney for Congress
32 posted on 03/22/2010 6:05:06 AM PDT by illinifan (we have not yet begun to fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: illinifan
oops, wrong link - let's try that again.
Mulvaney for Congress
33 posted on 03/22/2010 6:06:52 AM PDT by illinifan (we have not yet begun to fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
What do you suggest and don’t pin all your hops on Nov 2010.

I'm all for every constitutional challenge that anyone can muster. Never said anything otherwise. I'm just not giddy with anticipation that the SCOTUS is certain to overturn this bill. I'll be very surprised if they even agree to hear the case. Even if they do agree to hear it, given the direction that most rulings they have handed down over the past 10 years have gone, I'm not at all optimistic that this will be overturned......

34 posted on 03/22/2010 6:08:27 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

Great post! I heard that we might have 40. I like that math too!

You wrote-

“As of yesterday there were at least 38 states that were planning on filing individually or taking part in the Texas/Abbot filing. Some had a count of over 40 states.

With 38 States against this, we can bypass the USSC and go straight to a Constitutional Amendment.

2/3 of the States can introduce an Amendment, the House and Senate at that time must send it to the States for ratification where 3/4 much approve.

Do the math, with 38 we win.”


35 posted on 03/22/2010 6:17:03 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Stupak’s Republican challenger just became one of the most important Republicans in the US (American Spectator quote).

Once the people of Stupak’s district learn of the bribe on top of the pro-life sell out, he should be gone in November (he was a shoe-in to keep his seat before yesterday).

A year late BUT David Horowitz yesterday found a video of Stupak from last year when Health Care first came up for a vote. He didn’t know he was being taped and said flat out he was voting for it, regardless of what it said about abortion or federal funding there of.

I have not checked today the number of hits the video has but yesterday it was going viral.

http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=287806148754

WOW, just looked - he has over 12,000 followers now on Facebook alone. He had 200 before Stupak did his Judas trick!!!! Excellent


36 posted on 03/22/2010 6:28:47 AM PDT by Brytani (Good Morning Comrades!!! FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

Go get this bill.....and kill it dead


37 posted on 03/22/2010 6:33:30 AM PDT by The Wizard (I support Madam President, the only President in America today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

Can we get 38 or 40 states? Anyone checked on the Constitutional Amendment? We need to resist and fight any and every way we can.

I am trying to think of states that would NOT go along?

HI, VT, IL, MI(?), NY(?), CT(?), OR(?), WA(?), CA(?), RI (?) and probably MD???

We need to keep this thread and idea alive.


38 posted on 03/22/2010 8:06:21 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Hummmmm, it’s logical that California would go along with a challenge to this bill since Arnold has indicated that the State can’t handle it. Also, California’s warm weather draws in an enormous amount of senior citizens who then rely on their Medicare.


39 posted on 03/22/2010 8:16:32 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

Good point. We have to get the seniors against this nightmare now.


40 posted on 03/22/2010 8:19:33 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson