Replies

Thanks to Dr. Bogus Pachysandra for alert to check Climate Depot.

So how are they going to model the impact of dust and aerosols from a volcano....this one just happened...FR Thread:

Iceland prepares for second, more devastating volcanic eruption-Northern Hemisphere Cooling?

I have to visit the Climate Depot site. Last few days have been working, then having to retire early and not spending to much time on the Internet. Got off tomorrow... will attempt to catch up a bit.
Interesting though. The NASA scientist referenced seems to cozy. And still claims of some major link between CO2 and the rest of the bag. I am not buying it. Either CO2 can be shown within the atmosphere as being a major contributor to physical heat transfer of any significance beyond the probably established maximum of 8% in total forced heat exchanged within the 100 microns plus of IR back ground radiation etc., or it is no player.
We cannot have it both ways. The more I read from both ends of the spectrum on this issue, the more wishy washy the whole damn issue becomes.
My brother and many other chemist and physicist, specialist in spectroscopy have made it clear CO2 is not a primary contributor based on it's attributes. How it can absorb very narrow bands of IR energy and then somehow as the electrons are jacked up for a specific short period of time can then somehow transfer the energy still within the heat range of the spectrum into water molecules etc, as the electron cloud of those sparsely distributed molecules goes into decay mode..
There is just to damn much double talk among supposed scientist taking place.
The hell with goons like Al Gore. He is just some damn commie son who wants to make billions of dollars on a false theory. He can be eventually laughed out of existence, hopefully, and lose big bucks as a penalty for his sins. But I don't like to hear the continued reference to how CO2 can somehow play a major rule in the heating of the earth's oceans and surface due to the claimed mechanisms we have so far seen set forth. To much IMHO continues to be placed on a few low level hydrocarbons and not enough thought into the positioning of the earth within the solar orbit, the tilt of the earth relative to the sun over a period of time, the change in relative location to the earth with the surrounding galaxy etc., and how the switch in ocean temperatures during cycles effect the over all global or partial global land surface temperatures.
I write poorly. But I hope I get my point over, with no harsh criticism.
Like many here, I am a bit spent. Perhaps my wording is hash.

Thanx !

Beam me to Planet Gore !