Citing a 1963 letter, to accuse the current Pope only shows the lengths you will go to, or better the depts you will stoop to. Tell you what blewdragon, clean up your own denomination and then get back to me.
What denomination is that?
How much the current occupant of the papal office has to do with past cover-ups, I don't know, nor have I explicitly accused him, himself, as being responsible. But there HAVE BEEN cover-ups, in the Los Angeles Diocese, in the very least, which is one of the "facts" I spoke about.
The link I provided was towards re-establishing, providing additional, nearly up-to-the minute additional info, concerning THAT "fact".
Did you see the guy's picture?
What denomination is that? What needs to be "cleaned up", and why do "I" need to do that, then "get back to you"?
I've never demanded that you yourself go "clean up" any messes, now have I?
Besides, no denomination which I belong to, nor any other which I know of, has had a history of covering up such "messes" to the same extent as the Roman denomination appears to have had --- from multiple levels of authority & oversight. If there was other similar "messes, there'd be howls from so many quarters, I doubt that my own contributions would be necessary.
...But that wouldn't stop me from discussing it on the pages of FreeRepublic.