Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LukeL

Yes, he often borrowed source material, but it’s what he did with it that is so amazing. The story of a Danish prince wasn’t all that interesting, and who would have otherwise guesses that a write could make something so sublime of it. It’s the language, the wit, the psychology, the metaphysics, that make Shakespeare great. To worry about the source material is missing the point entirely. I can guarantee you, no one is reading Saxo or Belleforest today, because they think it is fsantastic.


5 posted on 03/16/2010 12:59:25 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

That may be true, but his authorsip is in doubt, and not to knock your screen name, but The Great Gatsby was the most painful expierence of my high school years.


7 posted on 03/16/2010 1:29:47 AM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

11 posted on 03/16/2010 3:45:54 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Authors in those days generally did not do all original work. If they did it would have then been disregarded as of no value.
Art was in reworking already known themes and incidents with one’s own insights and techniques.


29 posted on 03/16/2010 9:05:43 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di tray hoi den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson