Agreed. Either pick standard time or go one hour ahead and have the clocks stay there. I prefer standard time but if we go either way and it stays that way, Im all for it.
There are probably several reasons for it, but I remember two in particular. One had to do with not sending Elenetary School kids and them being in the dark when travelling either to or from school.
The second one had to do with energy savings, overall.
Now, both of those would not be a fact -- if only -- people themselves, all businesses, schools and government offices and so on -- all adjusted their starting times at different times of the year, and simply "go with the sun".
BUT, people and businesses and schools don't do that, so the government simply changes the clocks across the board -- which accomplishes the same thing as people doing it themselves, except that they won't... LOL ...
Adding daylight to afternoons benefits retailing, sports, and other activities that exploit sunlight after working hours,[3] but causes problems for farming, evening entertainment and other occupations tied to the sun.[4][5] Traffic fatalities are reduced when there is extra afternoon daylight;[6] its effect on health and crime is less clear. Although an early goal of DST was to reduce evening usage of incandescent lighting, formerly a primary use of electricity,[7] modern heating and cooling usage patterns differ greatly, and research about how DST currently affects energy use is limited and often contradictory.[8]
DST's occasional clock shifts present other challenges. They complicate timekeeping, and can disrupt meetings, travel, billing, recordkeeping, medical devices, heavy equipment,[9] and sleep patterns.[10] Software can often adjust computer clocks automatically, but this can be limited and error-prone, particularly when DST rules change.