Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum
Wait ... she was a Hollywood icon, regardless it was more for a notable TV role, but how was this any different than David Carradine?

Someone needs to dig a bit deeper, it cannot possibly be a simple *she didn't make a ton of blockbuster films*, not if they're going to include Michael Jackson and Natasha Richardson.

18 posted on 03/11/2010 9:26:18 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MozarkDawg

Exactly right.


19 posted on 03/11/2010 9:27:33 AM PST by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MozarkDawg

I support Fawcett being recognized last Sunday night, but Natasha had far more movies and a significantly better film career. They tripped all over themselves to explain Michael Jackson. That opens the door for anyone who’s every had a speaking part to be included.


28 posted on 03/11/2010 9:40:01 AM PST by votemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MozarkDawg
Wait ... she was a Hollywood icon, regardless it was more for a notable TV role, but how was this any different than David Carradine?

David Carradine was in mucho, mucho movies. And without him, Kill Bill would have beem Kill Godot

But Brittany Murphy? I didn't know she had been alive.

57 posted on 03/11/2010 2:27:42 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (great thing about being a cynic: you can enjoy being proved wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson