Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wendy1946

I was in naval nuclear power for nine years, and even though reactor principles was my best subject gravitrons were not really something we worried about on a day to day basis.

I try to read threads like this every once in a while to see if my brain is still capable of scientific thought.

The answer appears to be ‘not really’.


40 posted on 03/08/2010 5:14:28 AM PST by Pan_Yan (Trolls: I R 1, R U 1 2?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Pan_Yan
Ralph Sansbury's ideas start off simply enough. He was doing experiments with currents and he noticed that currents create electrostatic fields, which is not supposed to happen, and that the fields reverse when the current reverses. The explanation: nuclear particles particularly electrons, previously thought to be indivisible as atoms once were thought to be, must have structure and sub particles of their own. At rest such electron-solar-systems would not create electrostatic dipoles but under the stress of a voltage the orbits of such particles would become eliptical and create dipoles, and the cumulative effect of such dipoles in their quadrillions would create an electrostatic field which would in fact reverse when the current reversed.

The computed necessary speed for a sub-electron particle would get you to one of the near galaxies in a couple of seconds. That leads to all kinds of interesting things, try linking to the link I provided above and download the PDF book file.

41 posted on 03/08/2010 5:32:22 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson