Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
I mean, really, if you want them to accomplish nothing more in life than being a burger flipper at McD’s, then teach them creation instead of evolution.

If there's something that's way overrated, it's the teaching of science. If you're going to be a biologist, what you believe about the creation of life might matter.

Teaching the scientific method as a way to problem solve would be helpful to people in careers where they find themselves with problems to solve or new things to learn often. Not so much for learning the results of experiments that don't have a lot of bearing on your job. Is it really important to a welder to know how the kinetics of the reaction that occurs when they cut steel with an oxy/acetylene torch? How important to your average person is it to know quantum mechanics?

I have a degree in chemistry.

14 posted on 03/06/2010 4:22:11 PM PST by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing to you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: MichiganConservative

I think that learning the scientific method is essential to being able to understand and do science.

Requiring adherence to the latest scientific consensus only stifles learning and the ability to think that makes the application of the scientific method a useful tool to use.


18 posted on 03/06/2010 4:25:00 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson