[ohioman]

The problem is that hardly anything you say about AGW is “true or accurate”. That is what bothers me. You are nothing but a shill for those who would tax all of us for an outright lie.

[astyanax]

"You are nothing but a shill..."
I think it was the "flak" in the title that got to him.
:)

[cogitator]

The problem is that hardly anything you say about AGW is “true or accurate”.

I'd sure like some examples of something I've said that isn't. I have occasionally made a mistake, and I usually acknowledge them when they're pointed out.

You are nothing but a shill for those who would tax all of us for an outright lie.

I'm not a shill for "them" because I don't agree with that approach, but it is not a lie. I just replied to astyanax:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2464081/posts?page=25#25

If it's an "outright lie", then what is the correct explanation (that would be the accurate and truthful explanation, rather than the "outright lie") for observed stratospheric cooling?