Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
"The 1997-1998 El Nino was so big that it yanked (statistically) the uncertain trend upward. Even despite the ensuing cool La Nina, the subsequent warmer years maintained the established trend.
Great. And that's an argument in favor of AGW how?!
"Whatever works for you."
Facts work for me. And when it comes to AGW, they're not there.
14 posted on 03/18/2010 6:06:07 AM PDT by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: astyanax
Great. And that's an argument in favor of AGW how?!

It's not and wasn't meant to be an argument in favor of AGW. It was meant to show that someone arguing against AGW made a big, easily shown and easily correctable error. To make an argument for AGW, you combine observational data with climate models that allow the determination of climate forcing factors, and what emerges from this analysis is the most important climate forcing factors.

Facts work for me. And when it comes to AGW, they're not there.

Feel free to think you're correct.

17 posted on 03/22/2010 10:22:13 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson