Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Intolerant in NJ
"I thought they could only “reconcile” the bill already passed by the Senate with the House version of the same bill once the House voted on it,

That's certainly what common sense would dictate, but that's not how it has to work. They can pass the reconciliation bill first, so long as Obama ends up signing the original Senate legislation before he signs the Reconciliation. They'd just pass Reconciliation first, then sit on it until the House passes the Senate bill. Confusing, I know.

14 posted on 03/02/2010 10:24:23 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

Ok so why would the house pass the senate bill? Are there enough votes?


19 posted on 03/02/2010 10:52:44 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand
Here's how James Capretta at NRO explains it:

"...the bill the House would have to approve first would still include all of the egregious deals struck with individual Senators to buy their votes for passage in December. The special Medicaid arrangement for Nebraska. The exemption of Florida seniors from the Medicare Advantage cuts. The $300 million for Louisiana. Those, and many others, are all in the Senate-passed bill that Speaker Pelosi will be trying to sell in coming days.

Of course, the Speaker will tell these members, don’t worry, the reconciliation bill will fix all these problems. But will it?

If anything, what the president is now pushing, and will presumably push again tomorrow, would make the Senate bill even more expensive, by upping the premium subsidies, closing the Medicare “donut hole,” and giving all states the same deal as Nebraska. These added costs would be paid for with an entirely new Medicare payroll tax, applied toinvestment earnings. In other words, just days after voting for a highly controversial, trillion-dollar health-care bill, House Democrats would be asked to vote for a reconciliation bill that taxes and spends even more. And then that measure would go to the Senate, where there are never any guarantees that something will emerge unscathed."

IOW, nothing in the Senate bill can be changed by the House -- it's an up or down vote on the Senate bill, and they'll have to pray that the Senate makes acceptable changes through a hinky reconciliation process. It's already been decided that Stupak's abortion amendment can't be added through reconciliation, so instead the Dems simply say that the Senate bill doesn't fund abortions, and the media will pass along the lie.

36 posted on 03/03/2010 8:41:47 AM PST by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson