Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PzLdr

But on the other hand, the British Lord Chief Justice allowed Weiszacker to introduce the evidence of the “Secret Protocol” to the Non-Aggression Pact in his defense, despite the Soviet Prosecutor going ape over it’s disclosure.

Nuremberg was a very odd sort of jurisprudence.


15 posted on 03/01/2010 10:59:32 AM PST by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: henkster
Nuremberg was a very odd sort of jurisprudence.

It certainly wasn't justice until the Americans began to lose their appetites for revenge.

17 posted on 03/01/2010 5:04:23 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: henkster

One of my favorites was the British “Old School Tie/Gentlemen’s Club”approach to war criminals. As someone noted in the margins of Sauckel’s file, “So we’re going to hang Sauckel for rounding up slave labor, bur not Speer, who ordered it?” And someone else wrote “Right!” [Sauckel was a blue collar laborer turned Reichsleiter. Speer was an architect].

Same attitude that covered for Blount, McLean, Burgess, Philby,and Cairncross for so long.


19 posted on 03/01/2010 9:20:46 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson