Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59

That’s just it, he didn’t eat it! He saved it, for whatever. And yes, I understand people were hungry. But I also know that I don’t think I could live with myself if my dying sister was begging for some bread that I had stashed away and say “No, you’re going to die anyway...”

I’ve not been in that situation, and I pray I never am. I don’t judge him for the bread alone, it seemed to be an overall selfishness in him. To know his wife is sleeping a few bunks away from his mistress and he risks going into the bunk... and he doesn’t comfort or visit his wife but his mistress instead? With her just feet away?? As I said, it just rubbed me wrong as to his character in general.


12 posted on 02/28/2010 7:13:47 AM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: autumnraine
These people all knew they were going to die, or at least they thought so. The ordinary circumstances that guide us no longer work for many people when they think they are going to be dead shortly. Perhaps this man, and his mistress, figured that they, and the wife, would never survive. I understand what you are saying and I don't condone this person's actions, but I do understand how they could come about in those conditions.

Also, when you are starving to death, not just hungry but starving, your brain doesn't function correctly any longer. Saving bread without eating it makes no sense, from that action alone one might conclude that the man in question was no longer functioning on all 8 cylinders so to speak, ditto his girlfriend and his wife.

13 posted on 02/28/2010 9:06:45 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson