Posted on 02/27/2010 9:46:30 AM PST by Maelstorm
The illusion that the homosexual lifestyle is a normal way of living has been successfully propagated by promoting a “victim” image for homosexual persons, and by the pseudo-science alleging a ‘gay” gene.
Of the reports alleging, or promising soon down the road, a “gay” gene, not a single one has survived scientific peer review. There is no “gay” gene.
On the other hand, the evidence does show that homosexual persons are indeed victims — but overwhelmingly of their own behavior, not that of others.
Typical homosexual behavior includes regular contact with fecal matter from oneself and from sexual partners, tragically reversing several centuries of learning about cleanliness, and thus several centuries of growing lifespan. Homosexual behavior makes no more sense than playing in the toilet.
All available evidence indicates that the lifespan of practicing homosexual persons is drastically shortened by their behavior. No reliable study indicates otherwise. The lifespan topic is taboo among homosexual advocates because the evidence is so damaging to their case.
You are talking homosexual males, and you are stereotyping. There are a bunch of them that are on the “downlow,” too. I think the problem for women is way worse. The lesbians will make it through bootcamp and bully the heck out of the straight women the whole time.
Yeah and no one is listening. I wish they’d speak out on the cases of sexual abuse they know about. I wish those in the military who have faced sexual harassment and abuse would come forward.
Have you ever seen them play sports??? They aren’t very coordinated.
Their pretty good at pole vaulting. Good as ball players.
True I did not think about the lesbians...they would probably make it easily through boot camp. Well there you have it. No lesbians for sure...lol. This is just a mess and being that the train is going full speed ahead, humor is a must.
The dykes bully everyone, not just the straight women.
My concern is homosexual officers who could misuse their authority to intimidate subordinates.
I'm raising the BS flag on that one. The interviewee has paranoia issues. Over 40% of her female Basic Training barracksmates were "found to be" lesbians and many more were likely? If her statement were true and her class is anything other than a remarkable channeling of lesbian trainees into a single BCT class, more than half of all female Soldiers are gay. That implication is an insult to every female Soldier and undermines the pro-DADT (or pro-don't be gay in the army at all) argument.
Personally, I've always viewed DADT as an escape clause more than a punishment for homosexual troops. Overturning it may force straights to serve with homosexuals, but it will also force homosexuals to serve out their contracts. As for the 'gay sex in the barracks', well sexual harrassment and e.o. works both ways. If it's a problem for good order and discipline, it will get fixed. I'm amazed at how little faith some people put in the abilities of the military to handle its own business.
Another thing to consider is in combat zones will heteros expose themselves to fire to drag fallen homos and will they be exposed to HIV if they do.
You are right there is no such thing as a gay gene. I do know of a few studies which found women who took certain drugs during pregnancy were more likely to have children that were sexually confused on undifferentiated. Twin studies have shown that genetics plays a very minor role. People aren’t dogs we don’t find ourselves unable to resist copulating in the streets however the sexual activists would have us believe otherwise and they frequently do behave like animals in the streets.
Latest Twin Study Confirms
Genetic Contribution To SSA Is Minor
By N.E. Whitehead, Ph.D.
http://www.narth.com/docs/isminor.html
We saw how well it worked for the Catholic church.
A friend of mine related a story from when he was in Vietnam where he came upon such a case where an officer was in the the act of abusing a subordinate. He said he reported it and they discharged the officer. There will quickly be no recourse, already the media fails to cover in any coherent way the rampant sexual abuse in the gay community. They don’t even cover or object to the lewd and vulgar behavior that goes on in their so called “Pride” parades.
I thought the number was a little high but incidental homosexuality has become more common and acceptable among women and that may have been where the recruit was judging. However I wouldn’t be surprised that more “manly” women are attracted to the military. That aside there is no good reason to force or desire homosexuals serve in the military to begin with. They are a distraction. The same goes for women who get pregnant or individuals, who contract AIDs or other such diseases they should be discharged.
Blanket party time.... I saw a few when someone wouldn't shower....
Yes and they covered it up. At least now they are working to fix the problem. Public schools also have a similar problem but it is almost never reported on. The military has far more same sex abuse cases than the Catholic church and it is never reported on.
Uh...just keep the butt bandits out of the military. Does anyone really want people like this in their squad? We want our enemies to fear us, not laugh at us...
Quote of the DAY
There’s a lot of lesbians, and no, it’s not genetic.
If you want to see the lesbian capitol of the universe, then check out Pensacola, Florida. I would say that at least half of the women that I see at anytime here, be it in restaurants, stores, wherever, are visibly gay, and some of them are so manly that it is outright insulting and offensive.
Incidentally, I hear that there is a military base somewhere nearby...
I disagree. Homosexuals usually have as much, or as little, self control as do heterosexuals. However, that being said, individuals identified as homosexuals in the military will be killed.
Everyone should be crystal clear about this. There are far more people in the military willing to kill homosexuals than there are homosexuals willing to join the military. And if the murderer is captured, this means that the military will have lost not one, but two service members.
The purpose of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is *not* justice, but to “preserve good order and discipline in the military.” This should be kept in mind when there is consideration of punishment for military offenses, and explains why some offenses, considered petty in the civilian world, are regarded as very serious in the military world, and vice versa.
In past, homicide may have warranted only a year or two punishment, but sodomy, with extenuating circumstances, could be punished with more than five years in prison. That is, some homicides could be seen as far less detrimental to good order and discipline, than sodomy, depending on circumstances.
Now, this being said, the first inclination of those that would inflict this policy change on the military, is to insist that through indoctrination and lesser punishments, military personnel can be “reprogrammed” to not kill homosexuals, and more, to even treat them as equals.
Not hardly. It would be just as likely as using group therapy, and frequent nattering and whining, to convince people to voluntarily immerse their hand in a deep pot of boiling lead. In many people, there is an instinctual revulsion to homosexuals that is just as strong as their unwillingness to incinerate their own hand.
The next inclination of those that would force this policy change on the military, is their opinion that it is *more* important that homosexuals be integrated into the military, than the retention of tens of thousands of personnel who would kill homosexuals. But in that regard, such people are disinterested in the military mission itself, and see it of far less importance than their social experimentation.
That is, they do not *care* if the military loses its effectiveness, in that they hold it in low esteem in the first place, and would not mind at all were it to be humbled on the battlefield, suffering defeat and destruction. A similar view they hold towards America as a whole.
While the military has become inured to such manipulations, the Pentagon will no doubt eventually embrace having homosexuals sent into its ranks, fully understanding that they will be killed. But that is the penalty in itself, that homosexuals who would dare to accept the invitations of the social theorists, are foolish enough to deserve what they get.
Being relatively wise, the Pentagon will not report the death of these homosexuals as being over their sexuality or actions, but as the result of training accidents, violent crimes, and bad luck. Much as they do right now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.