Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Darth Reardon

Right. Raid1. It will of course also do Raid0. I just haven’t decided if I’d rather have more space and periodically back up everything, or have less space but not worry about backup.

On the other hand, I’d probably back up a Raid1, in case a catastrophic failure corrupted both drives. So I’ll probably make it a raid0. Disks are pretty cheap, and I’ve got several USB drives sitting around.

My problem is two new cameras which have 12 megapixel resolution, and a family who loves to take pictures, but not to go through and delete the bad ones. We have over 36,000 pictures stored now. On a good day, I might get through a couple of hundred.

I have a different drive for videos. They are even worse. At least I’ve cut just about every video I have to a DVD by now. I’ve still got I think one old VHS tape left.

My next task is to take all the DVDs and get them back on a hard drive (I only have my digital camcorder stuff on hard drive, the rest was 8mm DAT which I did direct-to-DVD, and for which I no longer have an 8mm reader). I have a backup hard drive that plays direct to TV, so I need to get my DVDs onto it.

I remember being excited to get a 20 meg drive.


19 posted on 02/25/2010 9:50:35 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

RAID1 is never to be considered a backup. Mirroring is instant - that means any corruption, damage or problem instantly also involves the mirror drive. RAID1 does not add data security - it adds uptime in the event of a drive failure (hopefully, if it works right)

The only thing that gives data security is a second discreet copy - a backup. That copy should be maintained by virtue of a backup utility. As such it is disconnected from the main data drive except when the backup utility is updating it. Should any catastrophic event occur your backup drive is hopefully not part of the problem.

A proper NAS is really a computer with shared storage. Most cheap NAS units today are a simple hard drive with a network bridge attached to it. They work ok except they do not have a way to manage the data nor run a good backup. Most of the cheapies also do not do the minimum required of a storage enclosure: maintain stable voltage and maintain stable drive temperature. Those little brick power supplies are insufficient to the task of a stable voltage output to the drive, and the lack of decent cooling is the other cause of higher drive and component failures. SIgnificantly higher failure rates. There is no substitute for a quality internal power supply and active cooling when it comes to drive longevity. All of which increases data security.

Quality NAS units, those costing upwards of a thousand dollars (without the drives!), have an onboard motherboard/dedicated processing unit to manage the storage, share it over the network, run backups and maintain the database free of corruption.


21 posted on 02/25/2010 10:10:36 PM PST by Borderline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson