I was being ‘vague’ in order to avoid repeating the rumor and calling out the paper. Thanks for pancake.
If you were attempting to be “vague”, then you certainly succeeded! :)
“...reading a conservative online newspaper.............Citigroup makes a statement contrary to the entire article”
“...‘vague’ in order to avoid repeating the rumor and calling out the paper.”
888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
absent a correction or retraction VERY SHORTLY from the “conservative online newspaper”, you’d better call it out, or shame on you IMO.
So are you saying that you BELIEVED Citi’s ‘nothing to see here, move along’ excuses for the notice that was mailed out? I will find it hard to feel sorry for anyone who keeps their money in Citibank after that notice was published who subsequently has a hard time withdrawing their $$ when needed.