Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BIOCHEMKY

per http://www.theodora.com/ina_96_title_3.html
the term “natural born” is nowhere in 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act Title3 Chapter1 , neither is the word “natural”

those stipulations are merely for passing on US citizenship for a child born abroad, for indeed natural born citizenship requires that both parents be US citizens and child born on US soil


3 posted on 02/22/2010 12:13:47 AM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: capacommie

Natural born citizenship requires that both parents be US citizens and child born on US soil.

THANK YOU

I am just as bad as the other sheeple, so sorry.

Thank you for the correction. I get it AGAIN.


5 posted on 02/22/2010 12:19:04 AM PST by BIOCHEMKY (I love liberty more than I hate war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

That is your assertion. What part of federal law defines “natural born” citizen?


10 posted on 02/22/2010 12:30:08 AM PST by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

Re: the term “natural born” is nowhere in 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act Title3 Chapter1 , neither is the word “natural”

That’s the point, genius. Now, you understand.

A statutory citizen (bestowed by man’s pen) can never be a “natural born” citizen (bestowed by God/nature).

1951 Immigration and Nationality Act is a collection of “statutes.”


53 posted on 02/23/2010 2:53:48 AM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson