Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MsLady; kingu
The article seems a little garbled, which is a shame because I'm quite interested in this. First it says the dances were "banned" by Quakers, then it said "...the practice was prohibited by Russian Catholic missionaries."

(Russian Catholic? I doubt it.)

Then it says the revival of the dancing was approved by the "Friends Church" (Quakers) again,though "some elders" didn't want it. So was this civil law, or church law? Was it voted on? For this particular church congregation, or for everybody?

In Mexico (Tepeyac) I saw a lot of Guadalupana, Azteca and Chichimeca Catholic dancing.

5 posted on 02/21/2010 10:30:26 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Matka Boska de Guadalupe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Yep your right. The article wasn’t real clear. Maybe it was both Catholic and Quakers??? Catholics I can’t see, if it’s Quaker, they probably don’t dance. I don’t know enough about them. If it’s church policy then you either go by what your church says, or you leave. I like the freedom to worship in an expressive way. Some people are real comfortable with doing that.


6 posted on 02/21/2010 10:43:22 AM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson