Okubo is trying to cover up what people are really accomplishing with this the ‘UIPA endeavor.’
Each time someone makes a UIPA request for this record or that, we are establishing a pattern AND at the same time uncovering bits and clues about Obama’s vital records based on their answers.
That’s just two ways that UIPA serves the people. We get to know how the government follows the law and how agencies follow the rules.
For example:
Did they collect money for the amendment to Obama’s BC? Yes.
Does it matter if I know whether or not Obama amended his BC before I ask that question? Nope.
The UIPA says that I still get to find out if it was collected and recorded in accordance to policy even if I can’t see the receipt and invoice.=)
This convenience for we, the people, is now a HUGE thorn in THEIR side so the Hawaiian legislature is going to change the UIPA to suit their needs:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2454976/posts
It’s an abuse of power and another piece of the ‘pattern’ that emerging.
SO, this HA article appears to be an OBVIOUS cover for that abuse.
They better hope the truth never comes to light.
Isn’t it the case that when they DID released the COLB to the public that the privacy rule NO longer apply to that particular B.C.???