“We don’t want a ‘progressive’ scale, “
I want to be sure you realize the “progressive” part applies to giving bigger corporations a bigger reason to hire people in the US.
It does not target “the rich” but instead gives fortune 500 companies incentive to hire in the US. Thanks
>>“We don’t want a ‘progressive’ scale, “
>
>I want to be sure you realize the “progressive” part applies to giving bigger corporations a bigger reason to hire people in the US.
In my experience the sort of scale you describe is called ‘regressive’... which brings up a question: why would you want to de-facto penalize small-business for being small? Especially considering the impact they have on the economy.
>It does not target “the rich” but instead gives fortune 500 companies incentive to hire in the US. Thanks
What would give them incentive to operate in the US, I think, would be an easy anyone-can-do-it flat-rate taxes with no exceptions/with-holdings. IOW, you wouldn’t need a law degree and an accounting degree to file taxes.