1 posted on
02/18/2010 7:01:51 PM PST by
cajuncow
To: cajuncow
Since when do you need to protect older women from gay men?
2 posted on
02/18/2010 7:03:13 PM PST by
Grizzled Bear
(Does not play well with others.)
To: cajuncow
It protects ALL men, not just gay men. It was a ruse when they tried to make it a “woman’s issue”.
Just like my company is participating in an awareness program about heart disease “the number one killer of women”. Of course heart disease is ALSO “the number one killer of men” but the sexists here are being divisive.
4 posted on
02/18/2010 7:06:48 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(DON'T SAY "Happy Valentines' Day". It's Happy Holidays! This is the Holiday Season (Prez Day Feb15))
To: cajuncow
I was under the impression that genetically, Gardasil could not work in men.
Maybe gay men are more like women than I ever thought. Weird.
5 posted on
02/18/2010 7:07:05 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
To: cajuncow
Gardasil Protects Older Women, Gay Men
Gardasil, sounds like a lubricant for deviants.
6 posted on
02/18/2010 7:07:20 PM PST by
maddog55
(OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
To: cajuncow
In the original trials the chances of dieing from the shot were far greater than from the cancer its intended to prevent.
9 posted on
02/18/2010 7:33:34 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: cajuncow
Isn’t this the stuff they had to give to very young women for some reason, and that some had a bad reaction to it? Or am I confusing it with another medication?
12 posted on
02/18/2010 7:39:56 PM PST by
pepperdog
(As Israel goes, so goes America!)
To: cajuncow
So, let’s turn the tables and make it mandatory for gays to take the vaccine (let’s see the reaction when it’s a ‘protected class’ instead of wards of the state — I mean teenage girls).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson