Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Darnright
No need for all that. I just cannot bemoan the fact that the AKC ‘ignores’ working breeds because I don't see their attention to a breed as an unalloyed positive. They encourage selection towards looks and ‘performance’ as a show dog.

There are already organizations and breeders out there selecting for a breeds intended performance (field trials, word of mouth, hunting organizations, etc), and they will maintain the adherence of the breed towards its intended function, which for most breeds -looks and affability as a pet are secondary.

130 posted on 02/19/2010 8:55:55 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

>I don’t see their attention to a breed as an unalloyed positive. <

I see the damage done by the back-yard breeder, whose criteria for selection of a mate for Snookums is, “is he less than 2 blocks from my house” and “will his owner take a puppy in payment for his services” without the first thought about his genetic health; much less the fact that his bitch has been on thyroid for years, and phenobarb to keep those pesky seizures at bay. Oh, and no worries that the prospective doggy husband has just been let off quarantine for biting the next-door neigbor’s toddler.


131 posted on 02/19/2010 9:31:26 AM PST by Darnright (There can never be a complete confidence in a power which is excessive. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson