How about a different policy, one that might actually reduce crime? Something like:
From now on, we are going to take all the money we would've spent on sensitivity training, diversity training, language training etc. and redirect it. Said funds will be applied to upgraded weapons, body armor, and range time for all officers. Additionally, the marksmanship requirements for all officers will be raised. These actions will back our new policy of "shoot immediately, shoot to kill" any armed criminal who does not disarm after one, and only one verbal warning. If the suspect is threatening anyone with a weapon, no warning will be given.
This kind of policy should reduce legal costs, and recidivism. Yes, there may be some initial additional risk to the general public. But after the criminal element has been dissuaded and/or eliminated, overall crime will go down.