I disagree. Why is it when Clinton is in office his daughter is respected and off limits (same with any democrat really). But if it’s a republican their kids are fair game.
The media either need to leave her kids alone or attack all politicians kids.
Well, if Sarah believed in gun control, abortion-on-demand, taking from the rich (meaning the middle-class and not the on-dole-public-servant rich), and giving to the poor (meaning the people who are able to work but are encouraged not to work) and if Sarah was willing to be a boot-licking, lapdog liberal, THEN she would receive the same treatment the Clinton's did in reference to their daughter.
You’re kidding, right? Either you’re too young to remember or willfully ignorant about the things said by people on the right regarding Chelsea Clinton.