He must be trying to find the conflicting data. It’s a corrupt lab.
I agree. I beleive he’s innocent and trying to find the smoking gun.
The entire testing procedure is faulty. The same lab gets the A and B sample, which is just plain wrong, which makes it more subject to errors.. Ideally tha A and B sample should go to separate labs. Each lab would need to have its testing procedure certified by WADA to get on the list. All the lab sees is a tracking number. The only people who know which tracking number corresponds to which athlete would be a handful of WADA administrators. A random number generator would be used to select which lab gets which sample. Both A and B sample have to concur for a positive indication. This method also can introduce some statistical quality control. If a lab is consistently producing positive results, or negative results, versus other labs’ results, that lab’s methodology can then be subject to audit. If serious faults are found in that lab’s handling and analysis protocols, that lab should be subject to decertification.