Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2010 7:30:56 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: opentalk

This is nuts, can anyone offer a plausible reason why he is fighting this? Really, who doesn’t get that he’s hiding something big?


2 posted on 02/15/2010 7:36:39 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT
ping...

“Without a doubt, Obama’s attorneys will not be able to muster a defense without a direct attack on the very U.S. Constitution and the rights protected by it which are the basis of the case.”

Apuzzo has got to get past the so-far insurmountable “standing” issue, but each time the DOJ or DOS has to reply they dig themselves in deeper defending Obama’s representations based on a “hearsay exception” COLB that has never been placed into evidence to be challenged.

3 posted on 02/15/2010 8:06:27 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

John Charlton’s prose is one step below a romance novelist on the “overheated” scale.


4 posted on 02/15/2010 8:33:17 AM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

I’ll bet the Third Circuit shoots him down. Any takers?


10 posted on 02/15/2010 10:15:13 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk
Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress is without doubt a case that will go down in the history books of law

I suspect the history books will record Kerchner et al. vs. Obama with little more than the following two words: Appeal Dismissed.

13 posted on 02/15/2010 1:21:30 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

bump


14 posted on 02/15/2010 2:00:56 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk
Without a doubt, Obama’s attorneys will not be able to muster a defense without a direct attack on the very U.S. Constitution and the rights protected by it which are the basis of the case.

Without a doubt ---

21 posted on 02/15/2010 2:30:28 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk
related article , Obama response to brief

Obama’s Straw Man Defense - Kerchner v. Obama, Article II, eligibility

link

41 posted on 03/19/2010 5:27:06 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson