1 posted on
02/15/2010 7:30:56 AM PST by
opentalk
To: opentalk
This is nuts, can anyone offer a plausible reason why he is fighting this? Really, who doesn’t get that he’s hiding something big?
2 posted on
02/15/2010 7:36:39 AM PST by
DesertRhino
(Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
To: LucyT
ping...
“Without a doubt, Obamas attorneys will not be able to muster a defense without a direct attack on the very U.S. Constitution and the rights protected by it which are the basis of the case.”
Apuzzo has got to get past the so-far insurmountable “standing” issue, but each time the DOJ or DOS has to reply they dig themselves in deeper defending Obama’s representations based on a “hearsay exception” COLB that has never been placed into evidence to be challenged.
To: opentalk
John Charlton’s prose is one step below a romance novelist on the “overheated” scale.
To: opentalk
I’ll bet the Third Circuit shoots him down. Any takers?
To: opentalk
Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress is without doubt a case that will go down in the history books of lawI suspect the history books will record Kerchner et al. vs. Obama with little more than the following two words: Appeal Dismissed.
13 posted on
02/15/2010 1:21:30 PM PST by
Drew68
To: opentalk
14 posted on
02/15/2010 2:00:56 PM PST by
tutstar
(Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
To: opentalk
Without a doubt, Obamas attorneys will not be able to muster a defense without a direct attack on the very U.S. Constitution and the rights protected by it which are the basis of the case. Without a doubt ---
21 posted on
02/15/2010 2:30:28 PM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: opentalk
related article , Obama response to brief
Obamas Straw Man Defense - Kerchner v. Obama, Article II, eligibility
link
41 posted on
03/19/2010 5:27:06 AM PDT by
opentalk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson