How does one go about peer-reviewing a "study" based on press accounts? (Not that he has any peers.)
How one can take him seriously is beyond me.
Enlightened opinion?? Clifton is a total wreck, and his study a very simple measure of media sensationalism coupled with his own un-measured opinion.
He has no respectability - another myth that ought to get the boot.
OK, I get where you are coming from...shoot the messenger. How about another source?