Carville:
>>”...enacted the largest unfunded entitlement programme in history with the Medicare prescription drug benefit.”
I find it outrageous that some who wish to be considered pluperfect “conservatives,” and wish to tell us all how to think, will use the same faux talking points as a sleazy leftist hack.
Although IMHO Med part D was poorly executed, and did not actually solve the problem; a case can be made for “necessity.”
Consider one case where (prior to part D) a person on SS disability had a total income of $837. His prescriptions were over $900/month. Then the Doctors added more, til the cost would have been over $1,000/month. What would a “libertarian constitutionalist” suggest, in this case?
DG
:)!!