Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2010 6:24:14 PM PST by GSP.FAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GSP.FAN

yeah something is up, because a whole bunch of lawyers have been running ads looking for women who took Yaz and suffered serious health effects including death(!!). They’re definitely fixing to sue. Not sure how the dead gals will fare.


2 posted on 02/08/2010 6:32:26 PM PST by mockingbyrd (Sarah speaks for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GSP.FAN

I hope they take them to the cleaners, those commercials are sorry displays of crap.


3 posted on 02/08/2010 6:32:57 PM PST by GeronL (Dignity is earned from yourself. Respect is earned from others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GSP.FAN

35% of women have negative side effects from “the pill”.
So, when deprovera went through clinical trials, do you suppose they used a “control group” of women who’d never taken “the pill”?
No, that would have been objective science.
They used women who had been on the pill.
Then, they decided that 35% negative side effects was acceptable, and approved it.
But wait a minute!
The “control group” was comprised of the 65% of women who did not have negative side effects from “the pill”.....then, 35% of THAT group (23) have negative side effects, and the FDA allows its use?!?!
Why should we be surprised about Yaz?
Wait until the “morning after pill” develops a little more history......
Oh....Is BREAST CANCER a “negative side effect”?
>http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/oral-contraceptives<


7 posted on 02/08/2010 6:43:32 PM PST by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson