Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chet 99

Baby’s fault. Baby wiggled its toes, thereby provoking the poor, innocent pit bull deity.


8 posted on 02/08/2010 12:31:47 AM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Sadly, a lot of owners take that attitude.

Had one owner being sued after his attacked two kids tell me it was the kids fault for “aggrivating” his dog by riding their skates in the ROAD. His dog didn’t like the sound, so he escaped and put the two kids in the hospital.

How people’s brains form thoughts amazes me.


12 posted on 02/08/2010 3:52:47 AM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Spot on! I really get sick and tired of these people who suggest that it’s always the owner’s fault. As if that’s any consolation to someone who just had their child’s face eaten off. These dogs are hard wired to be violent. Perhaps not all. But there’s no doubt they’re much more involved in the fatalities of humans than Labs. I also note a low life element in Pit Bull ownership. This is very true in Texas. We had a case here in San Antonio where two pet Pit Bulls ate an eight month old child. But, no matter, the dogs weren’t responsible!


30 posted on 02/08/2010 9:48:15 AM PST by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson