Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In their words: Experts weigh in on Mac vs. PC security
Cnet ^ | Feb 1, 2010 | Elinor Mills

Posted on 02/06/2010 12:09:39 PM PST by driftdiver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last
To: driftdiver
I'll have to take that as confirmation that you can't identify a single site that might have the types of malware for Macs that you've been spreading FUD about.

If the danger were really as great as you would like for people to believe, it would be easy for you to do. Instead, you just spread FUD and make non-responsive answers. Anyone reading this thread can see for themselves that you have nothing but hot air to spew on this topic. We'll just have to leave it to the kind readers to make what decisons they will make, given the facts presented.

161 posted on 02/09/2010 10:37:56 AM PST by zeugma (Proofread a page a day: http://www.pgdp.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Take it however you want to. Mac fanatics aren’t willing to open their eyes anyway. I’m trying to show others who may be buying that nonsense that macs are invulnerable.


162 posted on 02/09/2010 10:46:02 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Again, you make claims without proof. I see no one this thread make the claim that "Macs are invulnerable". What I have seen is several people politely request proof of your claim that they are succeptable to trojans and viruses. Since you do not seem to be able to offer such proof, we can only assume that your claim is unsubstantiated. Resorting to name calling (Mac fanatics) doesn't really help your case, and in fact underlines the fact that it appears you have nothing to stand upon.

If you had such proof handy, one would naturally assume that you could provide it. To continue not to do so undermines your 'argument' quite well.

In referring to previous links you expect us not to understand that a reported vulnerability does not a successful attack make. The difference between an alleged vulnerability and the ability of a malicious entity to root a box is not merely a case of semantics.

163 posted on 02/09/2010 11:26:01 AM PST by zeugma (Proofread a page a day: http://www.pgdp.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Malware writers have written PC viruses for Windows PCs targeting vulnerable population numbering fewer than 12,000 machines. Why do then they ignore 50,000,000 Macs?
The sociopaths who write the viruses are all Windows (and before that, DOS) users.
164 posted on 02/10/2010 5:01:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: gruffwolf
Both have 6 cylinder engines of almost equal size. Both have 4 wheels and windshield wipers.

Both the mac and the pc use the same intel chips. Same size and make engines ...

165 posted on 02/17/2010 9:26:35 AM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson