Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OKSooner

“S&W 642. You heard it here first. :)”

Besides being bigger than the Kahr, having less capacity and slower reloading, I just dont like hammerless revolvers. People buy them for being “snaggless” but I have never snagged a snubby in thousands of pocket draws. Just keep your thumb under the hammer spur and it is impossible to snag. Why anyone would want to cripple a revolver and eliminate its most accurate mode is ridiculous IMO.


25 posted on 02/03/2010 2:01:50 PM PST by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Hacklehead
Why anyone would want to cripple a revolver and eliminate its most accurate mode is ridiculous IMO.

That's why I bought a 638, you can see my thumb on the hammer spur. You'll have to forgive my poor trigger discipline.

51 posted on 02/03/2010 4:18:30 PM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson