First, in all the pictures of lynchings that I've seen (they were often sold as souvenir postcards), I've never seen a black face in the mob, and white victims have been few and far between. (e.g. the Leo Frank case). If you'd like, I can post some pictures.
Let's do the numbers:
Lynchings, United States, 1882-1968: 4773
Black Victims Nationally: 3446
White Victims Nationally: 1297
Lynchings, 11 Southern States: 3531
Black Victims, 11 Southern States: 3029
White Victims 11 Southern States: 492
Lynchings, 39 Non-Southern States: 1202
Black Victims, 39 Non-Southern States: 427
White Victims, 39 Non-Southern States: 775
So nearly two-thirds of all documented lynchings were of blacks, in the south. Lynching of blacks in the remaining 39 states are a little less than 9% of all lynching victims. Black victims in the south outnumber white victims 6 to 1. In the other states, white victims outnumber black victims almost 2 to 1.
A case can be made that southerners are more egalitarian in their lynching. Forty percent of all white victims of lynching came from those 11 states.
Post #183 proves you can use da google......wow.............we're too awestruck to continue.....................
(what does any of that have to do with you implying that the white kid was a racist?)