Another common liberal tactic: when you're busted saying something stupid, counter attack by questioning your opponents education and intelligence. (Sarah Palin gets this all the time.)
did you see that part that said "Ron Wilson"
Did you see this part? " and Kirk Lyons,"
I know you yankee liberals aren't real bright but do you know what the work 'and' means, don't you?
If you want to give an alternative version of what has happened in the SCV in the last decade,
Another liberal tactic: imply that I said something that I didn't. (your mentor, NS, tried that same tactic on this very thread by stating unequivocally that I 'hate the United States')
Once again you've been exposed as a liar. Your attempts to deny your dishonesty are lame and pathetic.
Your lack of self-awareness is awe-inspiring. Have you actually read your own posts?
Did you see this part? " and Kirk Lyons,"
The operative conjunction is "and." I know it's a small word, but you really must try to read them all. If I say that Barack Obama and George Soros conspired to take over leadership of the the US, are you really going to shout, "George Soros wasn't actually elected to be president, therefore he has no influence"?
Another liberal tactic: imply that I said something that I didn't.
Now you really have gone around the bend. The sentence fragment that you quote, "If you want to give an alternative version of what has happened in the SCV in the last decade..." doesn't imply that you've said anything. Quite to the contrary. You haven't actually said anything about the recent history of the SCV and its leadership. You asked for my version of the events. I gave it. That sentence is an invitation for you to give your version.