Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could 'Catcher in the Rye' finally make it to the big screen? Salinger letter suggests yes
nydailynews ^ | January 30th

Posted on 01/30/2010 4:27:57 AM PST by JoeProBono

J.D. Salinger, who died on Wednesday of natural causes, repeatedly brushed off entreaties to bring "The Catcher in the Rye" to the big screen from producers ranging from Billy Wilder to Steven Spielberg, according to EW.com.

But a 1957 letter suggests Salinger was somewhat open to a posthumous adaptation of his classic.

"Firstly, it is possible that one day the rights will be sold. Since there's an ever-looming possibility that I won't die rich, I toy very seriously with the idea of leaving the unsold rights to my wife and daughter as a kind of insurance policy. It pleasures me no end, though, I might quickly add, to know that I won't have to see the results of the transaction," he wrote, according to EW.com.

Whether Salinger was of the same mind more than 50 years later - having been long-divorced from his wife, Claire, and having become the subject of a memoir by his daughter, Margaret, that portrayed him a disturbed man - is not known.

Salinger saw the 1951 "Catcher" as a "very novelistic novel," not easily translated to other media. Too, he had been particularly upset by Samuel Goldwyn's adaptation of his short story, "Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut," into a mawkish and failed 1949 movie, "My Foolish Heart," according to EW.com.

Still, the interest from Hollywood never went away. Even Harvey Weinstein made his bid. It was rejected, of course.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature
KEYWORDS: jdsalinger; jpb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: JoeProBono
“Since there's an ever-looming possibility that I won't die rich, I toy very seriously...”

65 million copies sold and he may not die rich?

21 posted on 01/30/2010 5:48:40 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm really not Leo Farnsworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I wonder why General Motors never built a Holden Caulfield


22 posted on 01/30/2010 6:13:00 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (Don't panic, the lunatics are in charge and have everything in hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Me either. Never understood the hype on that book. I think it’s just part of the boomer-generation self-love pathology. Celebration of alienation.


23 posted on 01/30/2010 6:18:07 AM PST by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jagman

You’re right about River P. At this point they’d have to use some unknown talented 17 y/o, IMO.


24 posted on 01/30/2010 6:18:35 AM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I liked the novel quite a bit. As for a movie...it could work. I’m normally wary of film adaptations of novels I like, as I’m often disappointed (Dune and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas come to mind), but Catcher... could work with the right director and cast.

The film adaptation I am absolutely DREADING is the forthcoming Atlas Shrugged. No way in hell is that going to work.


25 posted on 01/30/2010 6:19:55 AM PST by DemforBush (Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
"The woods are lovely, dark, and deep But I have promises to keep And miles to go before I sleep And miles to go before I sleep...How long till Robert Frost gets a film?"

funny! those words from frost only remind me of the movie, "telefon," with charles bronson, lee remick and donald pleasance.

miles to go before i sleep hehe

26 posted on 01/30/2010 6:34:57 AM PST by robomatik (III %)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Agree; just like the Fountainhead....awful adaptation.


27 posted on 01/30/2010 6:35:23 AM PST by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

What chance would the book have of being made into a movie if not for it’s links to Chapman and Lennon? For that reason alone, I wouldn’t want to see it.


28 posted on 01/30/2010 6:44:13 AM PST by equaviator ("There's a (datum) plane on the horizon coming in...see it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
Me either. There was a movement when I was in high school by parents to ban it.
29 posted on 01/30/2010 7:55:46 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

The only reason I read the book in high school was because it was banned from the school library. In a way I can understand, Salinger went to the same military school.


30 posted on 01/30/2010 7:56:07 AM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I read it in high school. I thought it was boring... Well, beyond boring. I think that is because most of the HS English teachers were women. I guess it’s a chick book.

Asimov and Heinlein were what I read for fun. Butt... they weren’t on the HS reading list. We had to read Lord of the Flies and Silas Marner and Catcher in the Rye. Ugh!

Chick books.


31 posted on 01/30/2010 8:06:30 AM PST by Poser (Enjoying Prime Rib for 58 Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

His writing style is easily recognizable.


32 posted on 01/30/2010 8:21:35 AM PST by Canedawg (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Sure there was. It was about the attitudes that a young man has to leave behind before growing up. It’s a novel of maturation.


33 posted on 01/30/2010 10:38:29 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poser

Lord of the Flies is a ‘chick’ book?


34 posted on 01/30/2010 10:40:10 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Yes. Boring character development.


35 posted on 01/30/2010 7:28:32 PM PST by Poser (Enjoying Prime Rib for 58 Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Poser

Oh ok so any literary fiction is for chicks. Next you’ll tell me that Jane Austen is for girls too!


36 posted on 01/30/2010 9:06:04 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: csvset
I didn’t finish it either. Did I miss anything?

Yes, you did. You missed a story about a teenager who cussed and didn't like older people. Quite a unique classic.
37 posted on 01/30/2010 9:12:57 PM PST by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
It also has Zen Buddhist parallels and is about the maturation of a certain personality type. It’s pretty complex actually.
38 posted on 01/30/2010 10:02:00 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Borges
At the time, the chicks were interested, the guys weren’t. We were reading Heinlein, Asimov and of course, Ian Flemming. So... Yes. Chick books. The girls were a whole lot more enamored with Tolkien as well.
39 posted on 01/30/2010 10:47:41 PM PST by Poser (Enjoying Prime Rib for 58 Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Huck

It doesn’t celebrate alienation. Holden has a nervous breakdown and is growing up at the end. It celebrates the innocence of childhood and the poignant need to eventually leave it.


40 posted on 02/09/2010 12:12:08 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson