EEYORE ALERT.
You seem to be forgetting something: If Brown loses, Marcia the Baby-Killer gets in, votes for Obamacare (which includes abortion funding, death panels, etc.), and votes for amnesty, surrender in the WOT, more spending, higher taxes, and every other evil.
If Brown wins, Obamacare goes down.
Brown’s victory adds NOTHING to the abortion holocaust.
He is against Partial-Birth Abortion, and by voting against Obamacare, he will be voting against abortion funding, and a lot of other evils.
Brown is the least pro-abortion candidate in the race. That makes him the right person to vote for.
You are no Reagan Man, and no Republican, and no pro-lifer.
Not me. My memory is just fine. You have your facts all wrong.
In his last debate:
* Brown defended RomneyCare as a better alternative to Obamacare,
* Brown stated RomneyCare is good, but ObamaCare is bad,
* Brown stated that government "incentivizing" health care is good,
* Brown stated he is adamantly pro-abortion,
* Brown stated his support for Roe v Wade, that it should remain the law of the land and not overturned,
* Brown stated his support for the liberal idea that anthropogenic global warming is a major cause of climate change.
From Brown's website:
* Brown on marriage: "States should be free to make their own laws in this area." That is music to the ears of the militant homosexual community.
* Brown on guns: "I support the Second Amendment and believe that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms as a basic constitutional liberty. I support safe and responsible gun ownership." Basic? Sounds like a campaign commercial for Rudy Giuliani.... responsible = regulation?
>>>>>Brown’s victory adds NOTHING to the abortion holocaust.
That is moral relativism at work. Clearly, you are no pro-life conservative and no matter what a candidates positions are, as long as they have an "R" after their name, you'll vote for them. Even if they are a liberal.
You are correct on all of these points. How, on earth, sould a Coakley victory advance the pro-life cause?
You are no Reagan Man, and no Republican, and no pro-lifer.
I have long since come to the conclusion that he is none of the above.