I don’t have sour grapes about anything. I’m an Eagles fan and the Eagles were not a playoff caliber team this year and it showed last week. I didn’t have any expectations for the Eagles as I thought they’d bite the dust.
As far as Romo vs. McNabb, you could make the case that they are both chokers, but McNabb is an over the hill choker while Romo still has many years to prove otherwise. That’s why I’d take the Romo-McNabb trade.
The Vikings look awesome, no doubt about that.
After yukking it up at the end of the cowboys-falcons game, Brooking got what he deserved.
McNabb, born November 25, 1976, is 33 years old. Tony Romo, born April 21, 1980, is 30 years old. Brett Favre, born October 10, 1969, is 40 years old. Over the hill choker? Romo only has 3 years on McNabb. I’d be a bit careful labeling someone as “over the hill” when there’s such small difference in age between the two. Both of them have demonstrated time and again how they choke when it comes to the “big” games. I think Brett Favre’s record speaks for its self. FYI, I’m a 43 year 49er fan (and, a 40 year Patriots fan (raised in a 49er household, but at age 10 I really liked the helmet logo of the Patriots, for which I suffered much ribbing from my step-father)
Oh, and you should know that I’ve always like the Eagles too (that is, until they signed Vick - when he leaves the Eagles I’ll start rooting for them again).