“Corsis lawyerly language allows for Smiths document to be VALID because the hospital administrators didnt declare it to be INVALID, they only refused to verify it or had no knowlege of anyone verifying it.”
You’re a highly educated person, and I’m sure you’ve already encountered what professors in philosophy call the “fool’s logic” for example...
” Eve must have given Adam an apple, because it is not written in the Bible that it was not an apple she had given him.”
“You must be guilty because you invoked the 5th”
The hospital’s refusal to validate Lucas’ Kenyan BC does not make that document valid! The inclusion of that KBC with Lucas’ affidavit to the law suit does not make that KBC authentic!
“The hospitals refusal to validate Lucas Kenyan BC does not make that document valid! The inclusion of that KBC with Lucas affidavit to the law suit does not make that KBC authentic!”
Dr. Ang'awa was on record running a TB hospital and doing TB research in Mombasa at a different hospital and his daughter was born in Mombasa. Drs often practice at multiple hospitals in a municipality. You started by claiming that Ang'awa had no links to Mombasa, which has been disproved.
See Evidence that Ang'awa ran a Mombasa hospital in 1960:
http://books.google.com/books?id=Btb667glnuIC&lpg=PA68&dq=" rel="nofollow">books.google.com/books%22James%20Angawa%22&pg=PA108#v=onepage&q=ang%E2%80%99awa&f=true
I have never said Smith's CPGH BC is authentic. I have only said that those who declare it to be a hoax have yet to present evidence that convinces me. Yet those folks feel free to libel Lucas Smith based only on suspicions and questions.