we should take a better look at Lucas’ affidavit. What it basically says is that what he has shown to court is a true copy of what he holds. Nowhere does the affidavit state that it’s a true copy of a Kenyan document. So even if what he holds is a forgery Lucas believes his affidavit does not amount to perjury. Also what you call discrepancies are sufficient to demand some explanation from Lucas. The wrong CA, the mispelled name amount to evidence of fraud. Add the fake african pics shot in Santo Domingo, no answer to which countries he travelled through on the way from Congo to Kenya, no answer to which “water company” sent him there, no showing of a visa or other travel document. There is absolutely nothing Lucas has ever done which does not amount to yet another fraud. Why this time, against all contrary evidence, he should be considered trustworthy I truly cannot understand.
I do not know Lucas Smith and cannot personally affirm the authenticity of his CPGH BC, which can only be done by Kenyan officials under the FRE, and not by you or me.
Mik Taerg: You obviously can’t tell the difference between your personal impressions and evidence. You dishonestly characterize and conflate your personal impressions to be evidence of fraud and then go on public threads to make libelous accusations against FReeper InspectorSmith.
Lucas Smith, with his affidavit explaining in a brief summary how he came to possess the CPGH BC, made himself available to the parties, including Obama’s DOJ, to be deposed on all of the details backing up his affidavit under penalty of perjury. If Taitz's case had not been dismiees, under a deposition that Smith willingly and repeatedly offered to submit to, Smith would be required to divulge to the DOJ and the Court answers to all of the questions you have raised. The DOJ would easily be able to "impeach" (send up the river) witness Lucas Smith if he made false statements about the slightest detail in his affidavits. Remember how OJ got off in part because Furman didn't recall using the "n-word" during a play rehersal?
My own research has shown me that Lucas Smith has lots of reasonable explanations available for all of the questions you have raised that don’t include fraud. I say this as a retired Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). Your credential is what, Mik Taerg?
bump