Replies

“There is nowhere to be found in the transcript that there is an inference for the judge choosing to believe Lincoln over Taitz!”

Here is Judge Snow recounting Lincoln's testimony:

“Lincoln added that Dr. taitz had authorized him to sign documents on her behalf on other occasions in the past.”

Here is Judge Snow recounting Taitz’s testimony:

“She denied that she had ever authorized plaintiff Lincoln to sign anything for her in any case.”

Here is Judge Snow's finding:

“The undersigned finds that...plaintiff Lincoln correctly or incorrectly believed he was authorized to prepare, sign and file the pleading on behalf of Dr. Taitz.”

How could Lincoln possibly believe he was authorized to sign at any time if Taitz had never given him authorization as she claimed?

If Judge Snow had believed Taitz’s statement denying that she had EVER authorized Lincoln to sign anything, Judge Snow could not have made a finding that Lincoln believed “correctly or incorrectly” that he could sign for Taitz on this occasion or on any occasion.

The clear inference is that Judge Snow believed Lincoln's testimony that at least on some previous occasions Taitz had authorized him to sign for her (contrary to Taitz's blanket denial) leading Lincoln to "correctly or incorrectly" conclude that on this occasion he was authorized to sign.

Note that in the courtroom account as told by Lucas Smith at the top of this thread he describes Phil Berg impeaching Orly Taitz as a witness by backing her into a story that, as Smith says, it is hard to believe that the judge would have found to be credible. This is the very testimony in the transcript that may have given Judge Snow the clear inference that it was Taitz that was lying when she said she never authorized Lincoln to sign for her while he said that she did.

From Smith's account:

“In court today I watched as Orly Taitz told lie after lie while under oath on the witness stand. She claimed that she has never in her life given anyone permission to sign her signature. (This hearing today was about Orly's claim that Charles Edward Lincoln III forged her signature on a filing in Rivernider vs US Bank). Attorney Phil Berg was present as counsel to Charles Lincoln.

“Phil Berg went on to question Orly Taitz as to why then, if she had never given anyone permission to sign her signature, why then had she while in Israel contacted Charles Lincoln and told him to advise one of her dental staff in California to sign her (Orly's) name to payrol checks for the employees. Orly Taitz started to reply with one story that her signature is not used on payrol checks but then Phil Berg asked her who then is it that signs off on employee hours to verify them for the payrol. At this time Orly then started in with a new story that she took payroll checks with her to Isael and signed the payrol checks there in Israel and mailed them to her dental employees from back in the USA. ???????????????? I don't think anyone bought that story.”

“Lincoln added that Dr. taitz had authorized him to sign documents on her behalf on other occasions in the past.”

Does the above statement indicate that the Judge believe Lincoln?

“She denied that she had ever authorized plaintiff Lincoln to sign anything for her in any case.”

Does the above statement indicate that the Judge believe Taitz?

“The undersigned finds that...plaintiff Lincoln CORRECTLY or INCORRECTLY believed he was authorized to prepare, sign and file the pleading on behalf of Dr. Taitz.”

The above statement comes from Lincoln’s own admission that he signed Orly’s name, but did not believe that it was wrong since he used to sign a Judge’s name when he worked for said Judge. Lucky for Lincoln, Judge Snow gave him the benefit of the doubt!

“How could Lincoln possibly believe he was authorized to sign at any time if Taitz had never given him authorization as she claimed?”

If you read the transcript of the hearing. The Judge indicated that if given authorization, Lincoln can sign his name then followed by “for Orly Taitz”. Not an attempt to imitate Orly’s signature which is not acceptable.

“If Judge Snow had believed Taitz’s statement denying that she had EVER authorized Lincoln to sign anything, Judge Snow could not have made a finding that Lincoln believed “correctly or incorrectly” that he could sign for Taitz on this occasion or on any occasion.”

Judge Snow’s finding that Lincoln believed CORRECTLY or INCORRECTLY that he could sign for Taitz is based on LINCOLN’S OWN ADMISSION not Orly’s statement.

“The clear inference is that Judge Snow believed Lincoln’s testimony that at least on some previous occasions Taitz had authorized him to sign for her (contrary to Taitz’s blanket denial) leading Lincoln to “correctly or incorrectly” conclude that on this occasion he was authorized to sign.”

The Judge made no inference! Lincoln admitted to signing Orly’s name and believed that he did it in good faith! Thus, the Judge ruled not to sanction him!

NOW ASK LUCAS TO COME FACE THE MUSIC AND DANCE THE TARANTELLA!