I think the point he is trying to make here is the FDA is declaring this Toxic Chemical using in house hold cleaning products as now being a safe food additive. The FDA is being very hypocritical here frankly, they are bought off just like the Pharmsueticals by off the CDC (and hire most of the CDC employees when they leave) in return for little favors. I’m sorry to have to tell you this, the FDA is corrupt. But why change the subject, you want to change the argument to why Mike Adams used the term Window Cleaning agent instead of just Ammonia? Sounds like somebody is in some real denial ...
I was asking about the point of the NYT article, which is the basis for the Natural Times article.
So, after reading the 4 page article on the NYT website, what do you think was the main point?