How much would you donate to FR for the ability to filter?

Me ^ | 01/05/2010 | Me

[arealconservativeforachange]

This might be a good way for FR to pick up a few extra bucks while giving some added functionality to users. Perhaps if we show enough interest, you never know!

PS. Browsing is much faster if I can just filter stuff out. I know how to keep scrolling, please don't bother preaching about skip it.

[JoeProBono]

[arealconservativeforachange]

LOL! Wish it was that easy.

[Freddd]

I donated recently. And right after that, the site went stupid with pages and pages and pages and pages and pages of Nobel peace prize BS. We begged, pleaded and let it be known we would never again donate. I’m one of em.

[Doogle]

ya beat me

[CommieCutter]

Vanity Snob ping.

[JoeProBono]

Lest we forget

[arealconservativeforachange]

It’s a pretty easy function to implement.
It could be as simple as just a keyword and username filter.
Plus a quick way to make some $ for the site.

[arealconservativeforachange]

I’ll plead guilty to being an efficiency snob, no problem.

[cripplecreek]

Didn’t he win the nobel prize for inventing shaved ice or sumpin?

[JoeProBono]

Ya gotta talk to THE MAN

[adanaC]

LOL You’re confusing folk with FACTS. Search is very useful.

[qam1]

Priority #1 should be fixing the search.

[Ditter]

A one time $50 donation? Cheapskate, how about $50 a month?

[JoeProBono]

[carolina71]

Seems like a tactic to not read what you don’t want to read from people you don’t want to hear. Kinda like the Democrats.

Of course, I could be wrong but if I’m right, then I wouldn’t donate a red cent.

[arealconservativeforachange]

Riiight

[UCANSEE2]

You could just read the NYT, or watch ABC,CBS,NBC, MSNBC. They’re ‘filtered’.

[arealconservativeforachange]

Not sure what your point is.

Are saying it’s not an easy thing to implement?

[UCANSEE2]

Ironically, the filter you suggest would probably keep threads such as this one from ever showing up.