Posted on 01/03/2010 10:10:25 AM PST by SunkenCiv
>>Well Im knew here so I dont know the ropes yet and Im a girl so now you know and I believe Gods word over man so sue m<<
I have not gainsaid you in matters of import. But in more mundane matters you really must explain what science is in the Bible so we can see how it trumps man’s word.
so now you want to lie to all here saying I said . You say the Bible is a scientific text, but cant reference any science. You quote the Bible as a literal authority but cannot literally quote it. Standard fare for the pompous undereducated. You remind me of the women at the well now if you answer the simple question I posted we might get some where as to help you
Hey, you are new!
Well, you have acquitted yourself quite well, all things considered. Your use of grammar and basic argumentation have been pretty good.
Well played, lass.
You believe its blue because of what you see then? that would be a yes or no answer
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Prat Main Entry: prat Pronunciation: \Ëprat\ Function: noun Etymology: probably from argot prat buttocks Date: circa 1961 British : a stupid or foolish person
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=prat Basically someone whos a major idiot, or is delusional and dumb. Acts against logic and thinks hes self-righteous. AKA: Major dumbass.
I asked you first and my question is of much more meaning.
Don’t let others throw you — you really can’t duck your responsibility to deal with the issue straight on.
I gave you my answer look back at the post
>>You believe its blue because of what you see then? that would be a yes or no answer<<
That would be application of the creationist “I don’t know science so I go with what I see.” People who know science understand about molecules and stuff.
But you don’t get an answer until I get one. Trying to change the subject, while cute, is an old ploy.
If the Bible is your science text, show me where it answers my simple questions. 3rd (or 4th or 5th?) time I have asked.
>>I gave you my answer look back at the post<<
Nope.
Always good to see you descend to ad hominem. It is all you have so it is just a question of time.
I am trying to determine whether it is best to measure by number of posts of wall-clock time...
here we go again ..my or the bible is NOT a science text. It’s the INSPIRED WORD of GOD there you go 5th grader
>>here we go again ..my or the bible is NOT a science text. Its the INSPIRED WORD of GOD there you go 5th grader<<
OK, now we are getting somewhere.
So, if the Bible is silent on physics, chemistry, astronomy and the like, it is also silent on evolution.
If you believe in a 6,000 year old Earth (and Universe) ITOH, you are saying the Bible (via Numbers and other references) completely contradicts science. Is that your stand?
Hey, mr. rocket scientist,...
The Hebrew word for *day* is *yom* not *nom*.
Doing a search in the Hebrew leads to the conclusion that there is no Hebrew word *nom*.
A link to do a search for a Hebrew word. *nom* doesn't come up.
http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/
About that claim that you know more than me and my ilk.....
Are you really, with a straight face, expecting us to believe that without an education or experience in science, you can do better than you have done with the Hebrew?
>>The Hebrew word for *day* is *yom* not *nom*.<<
Yes, always on the lookout for them typos to POUNCE aincha?
FR doesn’t have an edit function.
Your point is pointless. But if you want to puff out your chest and say you FINALLY got one over on FD2003, I won’t stop you. If my slip gives you that after all these years, I won’t take it away from you.
you are so smart yet you can’t understand Jesus said its the blind leading the blind but my eyes are open thanks to God so I wont fall in the ditch with ya ><>
>>lets follow up so you say the sky is blue because you see it well my argument the bible is 100% correct because of what I read...duh its by faith I believe and its by SIGHT you believe or mans opinion same thing<<
I just didn’t want to get into an entire dissertation on molecules, light refraction, the human eye’s ability to distinguish what we call “color” etc.
And on that note, Happy New Year to you and yours. Thanks for helping me in making my point to the many and the few.
Adios and adieu.
Much of what is called science is mostly mans word and it should not be held as truth because ‘the science’ changes all the time.
Man’s word in the guise of science can never be ascendant over the word of God no matter much some want it to be so.
Well on the other hand I guess for some it can, and I dont want to go where they are going.
YOU didn’t post a correction and you made the *mistake*.
I will pray for you ><>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.