LOL Just turned 65 in September. Frankly, I am grown up mister. I’m not the one defending finding out WHO Obama is and WHY the hell he is where he is. Make not mistake, voter fraud, put this creep over the top. He is not so popular with “normal” America that he could have won without the ACORN criminal enterprise behind him. Go call names to someone else. I care and I really care, what happens to my American relatives and many friends. AND sir/madam, I do have some experience in life. I have lived for 65 years now, raised children and have wonderful grandchildren who I am extremely concered about. I don’t WANT to see everything go to hell now which is what I see happening. YOU on on the other hand seem to want to let “nature” (man’s evil nature”) take it’s course. There we part ways. There is a legitimate court case here. I’m married to Lawyer, I have worked with him and other Lawyers FOR 23 years (so in the law) I know that certain things cannot be overlooked. For instance, your Constitution. In Canada, it would be the laws of the land plus our Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. To say that “We the People or more importantly, the Military, doesn’t have standing?” Sorry, not buying it. So please save the “grow up” stuff, doesn’t apply. IF we ever met in person we would likely be friends but as I told you before, I don’t care for the way you come off. You obviously don’t care for my opinion either but that’s the way it is. CO
“Grow up” had nothing to do with your age or ability to raise children and be proud of your grandchildren. It does, however, apply to your level of maturity in conversation. Why bother replying to my post #100 in the first place? Did you have a point? No.
Regardless of your relationships with attorneys, you don’t seem to have a grasp on the legal issue of standing. Your comments are based in emotional rhetoric not legal opinion. You may think and feel that “We The People” and “military personnel” SHOULD have standing, but that doesn’t make it so. Our rules of civil procedure dictate how standing is applied. Those rules are not based on emotion. You would seem to prefer that we abandon our rules just to move forward on the eligibility lawsuits. Sorry, the American legal system doesn’t work that way. Ask your attorney friends.
Additionally, your comments about voter fraud and ACORN prove to me just how caught up you are in group think. If you had taken 10 minutes to research my position on that subject, which is based on personal experience during the 2008 primary caucuses, you would feel no need to make such points with me. You’d realize that I know ALL about the ACORN voter fraud because I experienced it, up close and personal, during Operation Chaos. I was one of 200 people to file a legal affidavit with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign regarding what I witnessed. After speaking with me about what I witnessed, her legal team asked me to testify to it and prepared the affidavit. So don’t lecture me about ACORN voter fraud because you know NOTHING about the details.
No, I don’t care for your opinion because it’s based on emotions and group think.