I just want to know that;
-The cat got paid for the day’s duty
-The cat was not discriminated against in the selection process for being an animal
-Not discriminated against for not speaking English
-Was not influenced in its decision by scratching, tickling or petting by the other jury members or the lawyers
-Was allowed its own chair and not have to sit in a lap unless it was the owner’s
-That sensible provisions for restroom facilities were provided
-That sensible feeding provisions were allowed as the small frame needs feeding more often
-That the lawyers didn’t use cute little names like ‘snookums, sweetie, babe, or the like trying to influence the cat
LOL
I’m with you ... if any problems with these requests, they should get the ACLU involved! :)