Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DGHoodini

Thanks al for the replies...Somehow I got it in my head that cotton, pre-Civil War, was mostly a South Eastern and South Central U.S. crop.


16 posted on 12/26/2009 6:43:23 PM PST by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DGHoodini

That was true, ante-bellum when cotton had to move to market via the southern river systems and required slave labor. However, post Civil War, Texas discovered this little thing called the Ogalalla Acquifer out in West Texas. They growed alot of cotton with that water


28 posted on 12/26/2009 6:47:56 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: DGHoodini
When Major General Gordon Granger landed in Galveston, Texas to take over reconstruction his first order was that all cotton was to be turned over to US troops.
46 posted on 12/26/2009 7:18:25 PM PST by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: DGHoodini

Probably because the Ewings only dealt in oil and misbehavior.


47 posted on 12/26/2009 7:33:36 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson