Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jospehm20

Yes, accuracy suffers. You go to about 1.5 to 2 MOA with the piston. Meaningless change in battle where “minute of body” is more important, and having a much more reliable rifle is the goal. Reliable, consistent, and accurate enough is what our soldiers want (from talking to those currently deployed overseas); being able to shoot sub-MOA groups is irrelevant in a battlefield situation.


192 posted on 12/27/2009 2:00:12 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier

That’s not too bad. What system is that with? I know there are many different. Still I don’t think I’ll be looking to buy one anytime soon. I like the SCAR but at $3K, I can buy a very nice AR, a very nice AK and a bunch of ammo for both. Even the Ruger lists for $2K. I would advise anybody looking for a good rifle to get a nice AR and buy a lot of ammo to practice with instead of spending the extra money on a piston gun that won’t be any more reliable to a civilian.


200 posted on 12/27/2009 7:11:11 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson