Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Very thoughtful review of a destructive movie.
1 posted on 12/24/2009 2:41:45 AM PST by Puzzleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Puzzleman

Another Michael Moore! Moore would feed a family of 30 cannibals living in a rain forest but he chooses to live in America while eating Big Macs and talking about capitalism’s deforestation of South America for cattle raising. And the consumer rushes out to support the nonsense, as usual.


2 posted on 12/24/2009 3:00:09 AM PST by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Puzzleman

This movie was technology vs nature. There are just so many archetypes one can use. He could have i suppose based it on Rome conquering other countries but maybe they weren’t technologically advanced enough. Perhaps Nazi Germany but Europe wasn’t so in touch with nature at the time and that fight,initially one sided from an armaments standpoint (Polish cavalry)or tactics (duh French)did not stay so for a long time.
Any European contact with the new world or Africa would have been alright to use but again,the differences between repeating rifles vs bows and arrows or a Spanish conquistador loading his rifle one shot a time is not quite the stark contrast.
At the end of the day,when a technologically superior civilization meets one not so advanced,one perhaps more nature based,there will be problems.
I’d love to know just what civilization the critics would model the story on?
Don’t forget,there are stories out there where we,planet Earth,is the backward civilization and ends up on the short end of the stick.
Oh and one last thing. The story doesn’t make every earth person evil. I watched it and didn’t feel like i was linked to the evil humans or the scientists. I enjoyed it for what it was.


3 posted on 12/24/2009 3:21:29 AM PST by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Puzzleman
Liberals don't want to live like “carbon neutral” primitives.... they want US to.
7 posted on 12/24/2009 3:44:30 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Puzzleman

Just does not seem like an interesting movie. Titanic was a phenominal movie that he won’t be able to repeat with any other movie he makes...it is a once in a lifetime movie. I will not see this movie but I encourage EVERYONE to attend “The Blind Side” by Sandra Bullock. I am telling you it is the best movie of the year.


21 posted on 12/24/2009 5:08:22 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Puzzleman
He has no desire to surrender his mansions and jet-setting parties to live in a rainforest with half-clad tribesmen. Indeed, at age 55, he would probably be dead by now in such an environment.

Exactly. "Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short" is for thee, not for me.

30 posted on 12/24/2009 8:53:56 AM PST by denydenydeny (The Left sees taxpayers the way Dr Frankenstein saw the local cemetery; raw material for experiments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson