Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: libh8er

Not really much choice in the matter. It’s entirely up to the coroner. I’d bet a weeks salary that there will be an autopsy, as there would for any otherwise healthy 32 year old woman who dies of coronary arrest.


3 posted on 12/20/2009 3:25:51 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

if she really had diabetes it could lead to a Schiavo type death, but I suspect other things are involved here.


4 posted on 12/20/2009 3:27:14 PM PST by omega4179 (Wanting things is not the same as knowing things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

I agree. The state of CA is OBLIGATED in this case, unless she has a MD who will sign the death certificate with cause of death listed. We had cases come in for autopsies because the person died within 2 days of hospital admission with no diagnosis. LOTS of medicolegal reasons an autopsy has to be done. Wills, age, suspicious activity by spouses/relatives, plus rumors of drug use.


71 posted on 12/20/2009 10:27:57 PM PST by boop (Democracy is the theory that the people get the government they deserve, good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand
Not really much choice in the matter. It’s entirely up to the coroner.

I'm guessing that it's probably a matter of state law. That would certainly explain the many differing opinions here.

FWIW,My mom died very suddenly some years ago from a ruptured aorta.In her case, an autopsy was mandatory because of the suddenness of her death. This was in North Carolina.

79 posted on 12/20/2009 11:12:12 PM PST by murdoog ("Aim high. Shoot straight. Praise the Lord. Audit the FED." Gary North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson